You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Table 2 General information and reliability items of the questionnaire

From: From conflict to harmony: changing conceptual ecology of evolution acceptance of muslim students after dialogue in science and religion

Variable

Instrument

Total number of items

References

Pre-test

Post-test

Acceptance

â–  Measure of Acceptance of the Theory of Evolution (MATE)

â–  Inventory of Student Evolution Acceptance (I-SEA)

28

(Nadelson and Southerland 2012; Rutledge and Warden 1999)

0.98

0.98

Knowledge

Evolution Content Knowledge (ECK)

8

(Nehm and Schonfeld 2007)

0.96

0.98

Religiosity

â–  Duke University Religion Index

â–  Intrinsic religiosity

â–  Scriptural narrative

21

(Beniermann 2019; Koenig and Büssing 2010; Manwaring et al. 2018; Teixeira 2019)

0.99

0.99

Perceived conflict

Perceived Conflict between Evolution and Religion (PCoRE)

5

(Barnes et al. 2021)

0.97

0.86

Nature of science

Evolution and the Nature of Science (ENOS)

9

(Nehm and Schonfeld 2007)

0.99

0.99

Thinking disposition

Actively Open-minded Thinking Scale (AOT)

17

(Janssen et al. 2020)

0.97

0.98

Epistemological beliefs

Epistemological Beliefs Surveys (EBS)

38

(Wood and Kardash 2002)

0.99

0.99

Perceived impact of evolutionary theory

Perceived impact of evolutionary theory scale

10

(Brem et al. 2003)

0.98

0.98